Damn I miss living in Germany.

BUSTED: Leaked transcript shows Trump begged Mexican prez to stop saying hed never pay for the wallDuring an interview on MSNBC, Zeldin asserted that newly-appointed White House Chief of State John Kelly would not diminish Ivanka Trumps role in the administration.
Ive had an opportunity to spend some quality time with Ivanka and a little bit of time with Jared [Kushner] as well, Zeldin explained. I am super impressed with Ivanka Trump. She brings a tremendous amount of intellect and class. She cares about certain issues child care tax credits, paid family leave.
MSNBC host Stephanie Ruhle interrupted: Can I just say one thing? As much as I appreciate you talking about fine manners and class. As a professional woman and a mother, its tough for me to stomach someone looking at me and talking about the great class, when you have the most senior woman in the White House saying nothing when her father says vicious things about a news anchor.
That statement is just tough to swallow, Ruhle said.
U need 2 work on your begging skills: Internet rips Trumps pathetic wall plea to Mexican presidentHowever, a leaked transcript of a phone call between Trump and Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto obtained by the Washington Post shows that Trump understood that he would never get Mexico to fully pay for the wall but he nonetheless begged his Mexican counterpart to stop saying so publicly.
Users blasted Trumps followers for their uncritical acceptance of everything Trump says while others suggested this is just the White Houses pattern to float extravagant lies, get caught and then re-spin the facts to attack the media or leakers.
I think that DM knows whose side DT is on.Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev has issued a warning to Donald Trump’s White House that the “U.S. establishment” is preparing to oust him from power and codifying sanctions on Russia is only the first step.
“The U.S. President's signing of the package of new sanctions against Russia will have a few consequences,” Medvedev, Vladimir Putin’s onetime successor in the Kremlin wrote on his Facebook page in Russian and English. “First, it ends hopes for improving our relations with the new U.S. administration. Second, it is a declaration of a full-fledged economic war on Russia.”
What a narcissist.Below are the eight craziest things Trump said in the newly leaked transcripts with Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto and Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull.
1.) Trump falsely tells Peña Nieto that he won the state of New Hampshire in 2016 because it is a “drug-infested den.”
2.) Trump said he would send the U.S. military into Mexico to take out the country’s drug gangs if Peña Nieto couldn’t handle the job himself.
3.) Trump begged Peña Nieto to stop saying that he would never pay for his proposed border wall along the U.S.-Mexico border.
4.) Trump laments that children can buy heroin for even less money than they can buy candy.
5.) Trump chewed out Australian PM Turnbull and compared him unfavorably to Russian President Vladimir Putin.
6.) Trump whined about honoring a deal with the Australian government made by the Obama administration to accept refugees — on the grounds that it would make him look bad.
7.) Trump tells Turnbull that “the ISIS thing” is particularly bad because the organization’s members do not wear official uniforms and instead walk around “in disguise.”
8.) Trump tells Turnbull that he is the “world’s greatest person.”
In an article published on Tuesday, Alan Shipnuck reported that Trump said that the White House is a real dump in a candid moment at Trump National Golf Club in Bedminster, New Jersey.
Trump fired back on Twitter, calling the report totally untrue and fake news.
Shipnuck explained to the Golf.com podcast on Wednesday that he was certain of his reporting.
Anthony Scaramucci
@Scaramucci
.@RyanLizza is the Linda Tripp of 2017. People know. And he is up at night not being able to live with himself.
Though there are some left-wing authoritarians, authoritarianism is more common among the Right than among the Left.1. Authoritarian Personality Syndrome
2. Social dominance orientation
3. Prejudice
4. Intergroup contact
5. Relative deprivation
Also,Intergroup contact refers to contact with members of groups that are outside ones own, which has been experimentally shown to reduce prejudice. As such, its important to note that there is growing evidence that Trumps white supporters have experienced significantly less contact with minorities than other Americans. For example, a 2016 study found that the racial and ethnic isolation of Whites at the zip-code level is one of the strongest predictors of Trump support. This correlation persisted while controlling for dozens of other variables. In agreement with this finding, the same researchers found that support for Trump increased with the voters physical distance from the Mexican border.
The average income of DT voters is around $72,000, so what must be making them feel deprived? Or at least insecure.Relative deprivation refers to the experience of being deprived of something to which one believes they are entitled.
Looking at the numbers,Historian Robert Paxton elaborates:
It was soon noticed that fascist parties were largely middle class, to the point where fascism was perceived as the very embodiment of lower-middle-class resements...On closer inspection, fascism turned out to appeal to upper-class members and voters as well...the relative scarcity of working class-fascists...[is because] those already deeply engaged...in the rich subculture of socialism...were simply not available for another loyalty.
The political explanation here is fairly straightforward: the poor prefer socialism. It's the upper and middle classes who oppose it, particularly in wealthy countries. So when liberal capitalism starts to fail, it's the middle and upper classes who are most likely to turn to fascism - not the poor. If this explanation is correct, then much of the high-profile pundit debate over poor Trump voters has been largely beside the point.
Turning to No, Actually, This Is What a Fascist Looks Like, I findWhile these brackets only approximate "classes", the general trend is clear: Clinton ran up significant margins among lower class Americans, while Trump won middle and upper class Americans by slim margins. This fits the general profile of a fascist movement defined by an absence of support among the poor.
Merging of state and business leadership? President Trump has been doing a little bit of that by flagrantly disregarding the Emoluments Clause.The 1983 American Heritage Dictionary defined fascism as: "A system of government that exercises a dictatorship of the extreme right, typically through the merging of state and business leadership, together with belligerent nationalism."
Back in the 19th cy., presidents were much less active, including in policymaking. They tended to leave that to Congress. Not surprisingly, presidents back then had much fewer employees than they do now.Since President Trump announced his candidacy in 2015, commentators have asked whether he really understands the office. Over the last few tumultuous months, some have concluded that he does not.
But another way to understand Trumps presidency is as a throwback to a previous era: Trump is in some ways a normal 19th-century president; the issue is that hes serving in the 21st century.
Likewise, in moral leadership, 19th cy. presidents tended to do much less of that.So far, Trump has mostly followed the 19th-century model, even if that wasnt exactly his intention. Despite his clashes with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell over health care, Trump has not shown an interest in the details of policy. He hasnt fully staffed the executive branch and hasnt appointed staff or Cabinet officials with a lot of relevant policy experience. This reflects older patterns in which the national government was smaller and did much less, and presidents didnt have the extensive professional staff they have now.
Then "America First" isolationism and economic self-sufficiency. These were much more common positions before the early 20th cy. Here also, DT fits that pattern fairly well, pushing energy independence and disdaining promoting democracy and human rights.Trumps approach has been different. He seems to prefer addressing the public through Twitter and campaign-style rallies over the conventional prime-time address. Twitter obviously didnt exist in the 1850s, but Trumps preference for partisan media is also a throwback to older practices. And he hasnt harnessed the moral power of the office, to say the least.
Conclusion:I also share [the American peoples] frustration over a foreign policy that has spent too much time, energy, money and, most importantly, lives trying to rebuild countries in our own image instead of pursuing our security interests above all other considerations.
If Trump cant sell the public and his fellow party members on his presidential style, however, he may face the same fate as 19th-century presidents like Millard Fillmore, Franklin Pierce and Chester Arthur: a challenge from within the party the keeps him from serving a second term.
The researchers used only white subjects because they could not find very many pro-Trump minority ones.In contrast, Clinton supporters seemed relatively unmoved by racial cues.
All it takes to reduce support for housing assistance among Donald Trump supporters is exposure to an image of a black man.
...
The study is just the latest to show that racial attitudes are a powerful predictor for support for Trump — and the newest to suggest that such attitudes play a major role in Americans’ views toward public policy. Previous studies have found that racial resentment was a much stronger indicator of support for Trump than views about the economy. And other research has shown that priming people to think about race can make them more conservative on a host of issues.
Like his unwillingness to disavow neo-Nazis and the Ku Klux Klan.In short, racial attitudes are a powerful predictor for a host of political issues, and racial priming can push people in a more conservative direction. That just so happens to be beneficial for Trump, whose policy agenda is built largely on cracking down on immigration, bringing back “tough on crime” policies, and cutting taxes for the rich and services to the poor.
So with all his racist comments on the campaign trail, Trump not only pandered to his biggest fans, but likely got more people to think in a direction that favored his agenda.
Especially if the President did not know about such assistance.It is cold comfort that we have no evidence so far that Moscow actually manipulated vote tallies to change the elections outcome.
But what if it emerges that Russian operatives were successful on that front as well? Setting Trump aside, what if a foreign government succeeds in the future in electing an American president through active vote manipulation?
The Constitution offers no clear way to remedy such a disaster.